Pathologists light level preferences using the microscope-study to guide digital pathology display use.
No Thumbnail Available
All Authors
Jennings, C.
Treanor, D.
Brettle, D.
LTHT Author
Jennings, Charlotte
Treanor, Darren
Brettle, David
Treanor, Darren
Brettle, David
LTHT Department
National Pathology Imaging Cooperative
Non Medic
Chief Scientific Officer
Publication Date
2024
Item Type
Journal Article
Language
Subject
Subject Headings
Abstract
Background: Currently, there is a paucity of guidelines relating to displays used for digital pathology making procurement decisions, and optimal display configuration, challenging.Experience suggests pathologists have personal preferences for brightness when using a conventional microscope which we hypothesized could be used as a predictor for display setup.
Methods: We conducted an online survey across six NHS hospitals, totalling 108 practicing pathologists, to capture brightness adjustment habits on both microscopes and displays.A convenience subsample of respondents was then invited to take part in a practical task to determine microscope brightness and display luminance preferences in the normal working environment. A novel adaptation for a lightmeter was developed to directly measure the light output from the microscope eyepiece.
Results: The survey (response rate 59% n=64) indicates 81% of respondents adjust the brightness on their microscope. In comparison, only 11% report adjusting their digital display. Display adjustments were more likely to be for visual comfort and ambient light compensation rather than for tissue factors, common for microscope adjustments. Part of this discrepancy relates to lack of knowledge of how to adjust displays and lack of guidance on whether this is safe; But, 66% felt that the ability to adjust the light on the display was important.Twenty consultants took part in the practical brightness assessment. Light preferences on the microscope showed no correlation with display preferences, except where a pathologist has a markedly brighter microscope light preference. All of the preferences in this cohort were for a display luminance of <500cd/m2, with 90% preferring 350cd/m2 or less. There was no correlation between these preferences and the ambient lighting in the room.
Conclusions: We conclude that microscope preferences can only be used to predict display luminance requirements where the microscope is being used at very high brightness levels. A display capable of a brightness of 500cd/m2 should be suitable for almost all pathologists with 300cd/m2 suitable for the majority. Although display luminance is not frequently changed by users, the ability to do so was felt to be important by the majority of respondents.Further work needs to be undertaken to establish the relationship between diagnostic performance, luminance preferences, and ambient lighting levels. Crown
Journal
Journal of Pathology Informatics