Preliminary results on validity and reliability from two prospective cohort studies on a new Neonatal Coma Score.

No Thumbnail Available

All Authors

Hart, A.R.
Kieran M.
Matthews E.
Mandefield L.
Williams T.
Johnson K.
English S.
Evans D.
Cutsey L.
Goodden J.

LTHT Author

Johnson, Rhys
English, Sharon
Cutsey, Lisa
Goodden, John

LTHT Department

Leeds Children's Hospital
Neonatal Services
Children's Neurosciences
Children's Neurosciences

Non Medic

Nurse Specialist

Publication Date

2023

Item Type

Article

Language

Subject

Subject Headings

Abstract

Objective To collect data on content/face validity and interobserver agreement for a Neonatal Coma Score (NCS) in well full-term neonates and on construct validity in unwell and preterm babies, specifically how the NCS changed with gestational age and illness. Design Prospective cohort studies. Setting Two UK tertiary neonatal units (Sheffield and Leeds). Patients 151 well full-term (>=37 weeks gestational age) newborn babies recruited between January and February 2020 in Sheffield and April and May 2021 in Leeds; 101 sick preterm and full-term babies admitted to Sheffield neonatal unit between January 2021 and May 2022. Intervention A new NCS. Main outcome measures Determination of normal values in well babies born >=37 weeks gestational age; data on how the NCS changes with gestational age and illness. Results Face validity was demonstrated during development of the NCS. The median NCS of well, full-term newborn babies was 15 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.84). In the'well' preterm population, 95% <28 weeks had a score >=11; 28-31 weeks >=11; 32-36 weeks >=13 and 37-44 weeks 14-15. The NCS dropped during periods of deterioration, demonstrating evidence of construct validity. Criterion validity was not assessed. Conclusions The NCS has good intraobserver agreement in well full-term babies, with a normal NCS 14-15. The NCS in preterm neonates depended on gestational age, and deterioration from baseline was associated with illness. Further work is needed to determine normal scores each gestational age, reliability at lower levels, how early the NCS identifies deterioration and comparison with other assessment tools to demonstrate criterion validity.

Journal

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition