Estimating overdiagnosis in giant cell arteritis diagnostic pathways using genetic data: genetic association study
No Thumbnail Available
All Authors
Chatzigeorgiou,Charikleia
Barrett,Jennifer H.
Martin,Javier
Morgan,Ann W.
Mackie,Sarah L.
Consortium,UK GCA
LTHT Author
Morgan, Ann-Wendy
Mackie, Sarah
Mackie, Sarah
LTHT Department
Rheumatology
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
Non Medic
Publication Date
2024
Item Type
Article
Language
Subject
Subject Headings
Abstract
Objectives GCA can be confirmed by temporal artery biopsy (TAB) but false negatives can occur. GCA may be overdiagnosed in TAB-negative cases, or if neither TAB nor imaging is done. We used HLA genetic association of TAB-positive GCA as an 'unbiased umpire' test to estimate historic overdiagnosis of GCA. Methods Patients diagnosed with GCA between 1990 and 2014 were genotyped. During this era, vascular imaging alone was rarely used to diagnose GCA. HLA region variants were jointly imputed from genome-wide genotypic data of cases and controls. Per-allele frequencies across all HLA variants with P ?<?1.0?�10?5 were compared with population control data to estimate overdiagnosis rates in cases without a positive TAB. Results Genetic data from 663 GCA patients were compared with data from 2619 population controls. TAB-negative GCA (n ?=?147) and GCA without TAB result (n ?=?160) had variant frequencies intermediate between TAB-positive GCA (n ?=?356) and population controls. For example, the allele frequency of HLA-DRB1*04 was 32% for TAB-positive GCA, 29% for GCA without TAB result, 27% for TAB-negative GCA and 20% in population controls. Making several strong assumptions, we estimated that around two-thirds of TAB-negative cases and one-third of cases without TAB result may have been overdiagnosed. From these data, TAB sensitivity is estimated as 88%. Conclusions Conservatively assuming 95% specificity, TAB has a negative likelihood ratio of around 0.12. Our method for utilizing standard genotyping data as an 'unbiased umpire' might be used as a way of comparing the accuracy of different diagnostic pathways.
Journal
Rheumatology