The relationship between parameters measured using intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a longitudinal cohort study.

Almutlaq, Z.; Bacon, S.; Wilson, D.; Sharma, N.; Dondo, T.; Buckley, D.

The relationship between parameters measured using intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a longitudinal cohort study.

All Authors

Almutlaq, Z.

Bacon, S.

Wilson, D.

Sharma, N.

Dondo, T.

Buckley, D.

LTHT Author

Bacon, Sarah
Wilson, Daniel
Sharma, Nisha

LTHT Department

Medical Physics & Engineering
Radiology

Contributor Profession (Non Medical)

Healthcare Scientist

Publication Date

2024

Item Type

Journal Article

Abstract

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to explore whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can offer a contrast-agent-free alternative to dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for measuring breast tumor perfusion. The secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between tissue diffusion measures from DWI and DCE-MRI measures of the tissue interstitial and extracellular volume fractions. Materials and methods: A total of 108 paired DWI and DCE-MRI scans were acquired at 1.5 T from 40 patients with primary breast cancer (median age: 44.5 years) before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). DWI parameters included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), tissue diffusion (Dt), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Dp), perfused fraction (f), and the product fxDp (microvascular blood flow). DCE-MRI parameters included blood flow (Fb), blood volume fraction (vb), interstitial volume fraction (ve) and extracellular volume fraction (vd). All were extracted from three tumor regions of interest (whole-tumor, ADC cold-spot, and DCE-MRI hot-spot) at three MRI visits: pre-treatment, after one, and three cycles of NACT. Spearman's rank correlation was used for assessing between-subject correlations (r), while repeated measures correlation was employed to assess within-subject correlations (rrm) across visits between DWI and DCE-MRI parameters in each region. Results: No statistically significant between-subject or within-subject correlation was found between the perfusion parameters estimated by IVIM and DCE-MRI (f versus vb and fxDp versus Fb; P=0.07-0.81). Significant moderate positive between-subject and within-subject correlations were observed between ADC and ve (r=0.461, rrm=0.597) and between Dt and ve (r=0.405, rrm=0.514) as well as moderate positive within-subject correlations between ADC and vd and between Dt and vd (rrm=0.619 and 0.564, respectively) in the whole-tumor region. Conclusion: No correlations were observed between the perfusion parameters estimated by IVIM and DCE-MRI. This may be attributed to imprecise estimates of fxDp and vb, or an underlying difference in what IVIM and DCE-MRI measure. Care should be taken when interpreting the IVIM parameters (f and fxDp) as surrogates for those measured using DCE-MRI. However, the moderate positive correlations found between ADC and Dt and the DCE-MRI parameters ve and vd confirms the expectation that as the interstitial and extracellular volume fractions increase, water diffusion increases.