Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture risk around a cemented polished taper-slip stem using an osteoporotic composite bone model.

No Thumbnail Available

All Authors

Jain, S.
Lamb, JN.
Drake, R.
Entwistle, I.
Baren, JP.
Thompson, Z.
Beadling, AR.
Bryant, MG.
Shuweihdi, F.
Pandit, H.

LTHT Author

Jain, Sameer
Lamb, Jonathan
Drake, Ruth
Baren, James
Pandit, Hemant

LTHT Department

Orthopaedics
Radiology

Non Medic

Publication Date

2024

Item Type

Journal Article

Language

Subject

Subject Headings

Abstract

This biomechanical study aimed to determine if variations in stem material, stem geometry, stem offset and cement viscosity affect mechanical resistance to postoperative periprosthetic fracture (PFF) after hip arthroplasty with a commonly used cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) stem (CPT, Zimmer Biomet) in a novel osteoporotic composite femoral bone model. Thirty-six osteoporotic composite femoral models were tested using a standardised in-vitro loading technique to simulate a typical PFF. Outcome measures were torque to failure (N), fracture energy (N/m2) and rotation to failure (degree). Comparisons were made by stem material (cobalt chrome vs stainless steel), stem geometry (CPT stem vs Exeter stem), stem offset (standard offset vs extra extended offset) and cement viscosity (high viscosity vs low viscosity). Statistical comparisons were carried out with significance set at p < 0.05. All tested samples produced clinically representative fracture patterns with varying degrees of bone and cement comminution. There was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure, fracture energy or rotation to failure between any of the compared variables (all p > 0.05). This is the first biomechanical study on mechanical resistance to PFF using osteoporotic composite bone models. For the CPT stem, it confirms that stem material, stem offset, stem geometry and cement viscosity do not affect mechanical resistance to PFF in an osteoporotic bone model.

Journal

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H - Journal of Engineering in Medicine