Comparative cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer using different risk scores and thresholds: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial.
Loading...
LTHT Author
LTHT Department
Contributor Profession (Non Medical)
Publication Date
Item Type
Journal Article
Language
Subject
LUNG NEOPLASMS
Subject Headings
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) is the most common cause of cancer death in the UK and worldwide, but screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces LC deaths. The UK National Screening Committee has recommended nationwide roll-out of LDCT screening, but the optimal risk thresholds for eligibility remain uncertain.
METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) population comparing three eligibility criteria: US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)2013, Prostate Lung Colorectal and Ovarian study (PLCO)M2012 >=1.51% and Liverpool Lung Project model (LLP)v2 >=5%. A Markov model estimated a no-screening counterfactual. Scenario analyses assessed how increasing PLCOM2012 (1.51%-7%) and LLPv2 (5%-9%) thresholds affected LC detection, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Payouts per detected LC were calculated using mortality and utility estimates from the literature and cost data from the trial.
RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) versus no screening were 3949 (USPSTF2013), 3797 (LLPv2>=5%) and 4013 (PLCOM2012>=1.51%). PLCOM2012 yielded the largest numbers screened and LCs detected, most QALYs gained and highest incremental net monetary benefit. Raising LLPv2 and PLCOM2012 thresholds reduced both ICERs and QALYs gained.
CONCLUSION: All three screening eligibility criteria are cost-effective according to the UK's willingness to pay threshold of 20 000/QALY. Within the range of thresholds observed in YLST, PLCOM2012 thresholds between >=1.51% and >=4% offered the most efficient cost-benefit trade-offs. Evidence suggests that lowering thresholds further would detect more LC cases while remaining cost-effective. These findings support the criteria implemented in YLST, but do not by themselves identify the optimal screening threshold for the wider UK population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN42704678.
Journal
Thorax