Biomarker Prediction of Delayed Graft Function and Prognosis Post-Kidney Transplantation.
No Thumbnail Available
All Authors
Banks, R.E.
Wilson, M.
Welberry Smith, M.
Lewington, A.J.P.
Kurth, M.J.
Sewell, H.
Bartle, R.
Watt, J.M.
Ruddock, M.W.
McAleer, D.
LTHT Author
Welberry-Smith, Matthew
Lewington, Andrew
Thompson, Douglas
Lippiatt, Carys
Lewington, Andrew
Thompson, Douglas
Lippiatt, Carys
LTHT Department
Abdominal Medicine & Surgery
Renal Services
Pathology
Specialist Laboratory Medicine
Blood Sciences
Renal Services
Pathology
Specialist Laboratory Medicine
Blood Sciences
Non Medic
Clinical Scientist
Consultant Clinical Scientist
Consultant Clinical Scientist
Publication Date
2026
Item Type
Article
Language
Subject
Subject Headings
Abstract
Introduction: Aminoacylase-1 (ACY1) and additional biomarkers were evaluated for prediction of delayed graft function (DGF) and prognosis following kidney transplantation. Method(s): Serum biomarkers were measured (days 1-2 posttransplant for DGF prediction and 1-3 for prognosis) in 237 patients transplanted in Leeds (2003-2011) in the discovery phase, and 319 patients from 7 UK transplant centers (2012-2016) in the validation phase. Median follow-up was 13.28 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 12.4-13.8) and 9.03 years (IQR: 5.19-10.16), respectively. Result(s): DGF occurred in 29.5% of discovery cohort patients and 18.2% of validation cohort patients. A DGF linear predictor combining ACY1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR1) and cystatin C (CysC) demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.93, decreasing to 0.83 during validation. Comparable values for the individual components were ACY1 (0.79 vs. 0.65), sTNFR1 (0.88 vs. 0.89), CysC (0.89 vs. 0.82), and 0.75 vs. 0.81 for serum creatinine (Cr) as the gold standard. The linear predictor variables for death-censored graft survival (DCGS) were CysC, ACY1, midkine, and recipient age at transplant, but k-statistic values of 0.55 in all transplants and 0.52 in deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) precluded validation. Individually, sTNFR1, CysC, and Cr were significantly associated with DCGS in both the discovery and validation phases. Preliminary findings indicated a consistent association of ACY1 and CysC with DCGS in DDKTs affected by DGF. Impacts of clinical practice changes and biomarker performance across the 2 phases are described. Conclusion(s): Several biomarkers show potential as predictors of DGF or outcome and should be explored further.
Journal
Kidney International Reports