Redefining Dual Antiplatelet Strategies After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights from Recent RCTs. [Review]

No Thumbnail Available

All Authors

He, M.
Magdy, J.
Aziz, M.
Tan, J.
Das, A.
Wheatcroft, S.
Bulluck, H.

LTHT Author

He, Maggie
Magdy, Joseph
Tan, Jun
Das, Arka
Wheatcroft, Stephen
Bulluck, Heerajnarain

LTHT Department

Cardio-Respiratory
Cardiology
Yorkshire Heart Centre

Contributor Profession (Non Medical)

Publication Date

2026

Item Type

Journal Article
Review

Language

Subject

Subject Headings

Abstract

For nearly two decades, 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been the standard recommendation. Recent evidence suggests that abbreviated DAPT durations may reduce bleeding without compromising ischemic protection in selected patients. This review synthesizes randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and guideline updates published between 2023 and 2025, evaluating abbreviated DAPT strategies after ACS with percutaneous coronary intervention. Immediate aspirin withdrawal after PCI increased early stent thrombosis in NEO-MINDSET and STOPDAPT-3. One-month DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events in ULTIMATE-DAPT and T-PASS. Three-month strategies demonstrated the most consistent safety profile, with TWILIGHT showing 50% bleeding reduction without increased death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (noting that TWILIGHT included 35% chronic coronary syndrome patients). Clopidogrel monotherapy after abbreviated DAPT increased myocardial infarction in STOPDAPT-2 ACS, highlighting the importance of potent P2Y12 inhibition. Meta-analyses confirmed bleeding reductions with early P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy across broader populations, though benefits were more pronounced in East Asian cohorts. Abbreviated DAPT strategies offer personalized alternatives to standard 12-month therapy. Three-month DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy represents a reasonable and evidence-supported strategy in selected patients with ACS. Risk stratification tools and individual patient factors should guide therapy duration decisions.

Journal

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Link to Publisher Site (DOI)