Real-world outcomes of second-line carboplatin plus pemetrexed after first-line osimertinib in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC: An international multicentre cohort study.

No Thumbnail Available

All Authors

Gomez-Randulfe, I.
Monaca, F.
Cantale, O.
Reale, ML.
Mrak, L.
Zullo, L.
Diaz, SS.
Bueno, MZ.
Mariduena Moreno, MA.
Davis, C.

LTHT Author

Lee, Daniel

LTHT Department

Oncology
Leeds Cancer Centre

Non Medic

Publication Date

2025

Item Type

Journal Article
Multicenter Study

Language

Subject

Subject Headings

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-line osimertinib is one of the standards of care for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients eventually progress. After progression, carboplatin plus pemetrexed remains the most widely used second-line therapy, yet robust real-world data in this setting are scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study from four European countries in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who received second-line carboplatin plus pemetrexed following osimertinib. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), safety, and exploratory analyses of associations between baseline factors and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 252 patients. Median PFS and OS were 5.3 months (95 % CI 4.7-5.9) and 9.6 months (95 % CI 8.2-11.1), respectively. The ORR was 40.7 %, with grade >= 3 adverse events reported in 19.3 % of patients. ECOG >= 2 and liver metastases independently predicted worse OS; ECOG >= 2 and a history of smoking were associated with shorter PFS. Early progression on osimertinib (<18 months) correlated with shorter OS (8.3 vs 14.7 months; HR 1.66, P = 0.005). Neither the timing between osimertinib discontinuation and chemotherapy initiation nor EGFR mutation subtype influenced efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world European practice, second-line carboplatin plus pemetrexed provides modest benefit post-osimertinib, with outcomes strongly influenced by ECOG status, metastatic burden, and prior osimertinib duration. Despite a clinically diverse cohort, outcomes were consistent with historical reports. These data help define benchmarks for future trials and underscore the need for personalised sequencing strategies, particularly in high-risk subgroups.

Journal

Lung Cancer