Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing.

Malcolmson, JW.; Hughes, RK.; Husselbury, T.; Khan, K.; Learoyd, AE.; Lees, M.; Wicks, EC.; Smith, J.; Simms, AD.; Moon, JC.; Lopes, LR.; O'Mahony, C.; Sekhri, N.; Elliott, PM.; Petersen, SE.; Dhinoja, MB.; Mohiddin, SA.

Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing.

All Authors

Malcolmson, JW.

Hughes, RK.

Husselbury, T.

Khan, K.

Learoyd, AE.

Lees, M.

Wicks, EC.

Smith, J.

Simms, AD.

Moon, JC.

Show 7 more

LTHT Author

Simms, Alexander

LTHT Department

Yorkshire Heart Centre

Publication Date

2024

Item Type

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory, symptomatic left ventricular (LV) mid-cavity obstructive (LVMCO) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have few therapeutic options. Right ventricular pacing is associated with modest hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, and LV pacing pilot data suggest therapeutic potential. We hypothesized that site-specific pacing would reduce LVMCO gradients and improve symptoms. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic-drug-refractory LVMCO were recruited for a randomized, blinded trial of personalized prescription of pacing (PPoP). Multiple LV and apical right ventricular pacing sites were assessed during an invasive hemodynamic study of multisite pacing. Patient-specific pacing-site and atrioventricular delays, defining PPoP, were selected on the basis of LVMCO gradient reduction and acceptable pacing parameters. Patients were randomized to 6 months of active PPoP or backup pacing in a crossover design. The primary outcome examined invasive gradient change with best-site pacing. Secondary outcomes assessed quality of life and exercise following randomization to PPoP. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were recruited; 16 of whom met primary end points. Baseline New York Heart Association was 3+/-0.6, despite optimal medical therapy. Hemodynamic effects were assessed during pacing at the right ventricular apex and at a mean of 8 LV sites. The gradients in all 16 patients fell with pacing, with maximum gradient reduction achieved via LV pacing in 14 (88%) patients and right ventricular apex in 2. The mean baseline gradient of 80+/-29 mm Hg fell to 31+/-21 mm Hg with best-site pacing, a 60% reduction (P<0.0001). One cardiac vein perforation occurred in 1 case, and 15 subjects entered crossover; 2 withdrawals occurred during crossover. Of the 13 completing crossover, 9 (69%) chose active pacing in PPoP configuration as preferred setting. PPoP was associated with improved 6-minute walking test performance (328.5+/-99.9 versus 285.8+/-105.5 m; P=0.018); other outcome measures also indicated benefit with PPoP. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, PPoP reduces obstruction and improves exercise performance in severely symptomatic patients with LVMCO. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study; Unique Identifier: NCT03450252.